0202011040528: Difference between revisions

From STARDIT
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 91: Line 91:
}}
}}
}}
}}
{{Qlink|101116128}}
{{Qlink|101116128}}Below is an archived version of the Alpha Version STARDIT report from 2020: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q101116128<div class="plainlinks" style="clear:both;float: right; text-align: center; background:#eee; padding:2px; margin:2px; font-size:9pt">'''[https://osf.io/5q47h STARDIT<br>(alpha version)]'''</div>
<div class="plainlinks" style="clear:both;float: right; text-align: center; background:#eee; padding:2px; margin:2px; font-size:9pt">'''[https://osf.io/5q47h STARDIT<br>(alpha version)]'''</div>
[[Category:STARDIT reports]]
[[Category:STARDIT reports]]
[[Category:STARDIT version alpha reports]]
[[Category:STARDIT version alpha reports]]

Latest revision as of 06:22, 14 November 2024

WikiJournal of Medicine article 'What are Systematic Reviews?' Description: This is a STARDIT report about the WikiJournal of Medicine article 'What are Systematic Reviews?'
STARDIT ID: 0202011040528
Dates

State completed
Start 2017-01-02
End 2020-11-09
Form updated 2024-11-14

Report authors
Jack Nunn (link)
0000-0003-0316-3254
Created report Alpha version of report, Beta version of report and Version One - preserved Alpha version in free text of this version
Location
Global
Other IDs
DOI: 10.15347/WJM/2020.005
QID: Q99440266
ISSN: 2002-4436
Aims
summarise systematic reviews and evidence synthesis
Keywords
systematic reviews
evidence synthesis
Category
research

Inputs

individual

Jack Nunn (link)



ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-3254
Task: Lead author, adapted content from wikipedia pages, researched and added additional information, responded to reviewer comments
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Steven Chang (link)



ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3193-7969
Task: Edited article, added information, researched additional information
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Mark Hayter (link)



ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2537-8355
Task: Reviewer
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Jane Noyes (link)



ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4238-5984
Task: Reviewer
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Daniel Bressington (link)



ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0951-2208
Task: Reviewer
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Roger Watson (link)



ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8040-7625
Task: co-ordinated peer-reviewers and manuscript finalisation
Method: Editor
Compensation: volunteer

Outputs and impacts

publication/report/document

peer reviewed article (link)



Impact: 15 citations (as of 2024.11.14)
knowledge translation

Artilce integrated into associated Wikipedia page



Impact: Pageviews: 125637 (as of 2024.11.14)


Q101116128

Below is an archived version of the Alpha Version STARDIT report from 2020: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q101116128

Section Data category STARDIT field STARDIT Report free text Wikidata encoding MICRO Compulsory
Core: Initiative context Identifying information Initiative name What are Systematic Reviews? Len Compulsory
Geographic location or scope Global P937 Compulsory
Purpose of the initiative

'stated as' free text

Explain the concept and usage of systematic reviews in plain English P3712

P3712 Q P6001

Compulsory
Start date of initiative P580 Compulsory
End date of initiative P582
Organisations or other initiatives involved Not applicable P664 Compulsory
Ethics approval (org) P793 Q98550700 P1027
Ethics approval (date) P793 Q98550700 P585
Ethics approval (ID) Not applicable P793 Q98550700 P1932
Funding sources (org) Not applicable P8324 Compulsory
Funding sources (dept or scheme or grant ID) P793 Q P1932
Relevant URLs P856
keywords, metatags, mesh terms, raid terms P921
Stage or state of initiative Date of report 4th November 2020 P793 Q37260 P518 Q10870555

P793 Q37260 P585 or

P793 Q37260 P580 and

P793 Q37260 P582

Compulsory
Methods of the initiative (what is planned to be done, or is being reported as done) Informed by creating a learning resource for Cochrane about systematic reviews, the author team incorporated learning resources into the Wikipedia entry. Authors were then invited to submit the page as a Wiki Journal article. The author team had multiple face to face and online meetings to review and improve content, including consulting experts. The article was submitted by authors for peer review and reviewed by experts. P4510 Compulsory
Link to a public domain methodology document P4510 Q P973
theoretical or conceptual models or relevant ‘values’ of people P4510
Input: Report authorship Identifying information for each author Name of report author Jack Nunn P50 Compulsory
ORCID author item P496
Public domain profile / institutional page author item P856
Accountability Key contact email at initiative for confirming report content Jack.Nunn@latrobe.edu.au P793 Q37260 P968 Compulsory
Input: Involvement in initiative Involvement details for each contributor Who was involved (named individual, organisation)

Who was involved (group of anonymous individuals acting in role)

  1. Jack Nunn

2. Steven Chang

3. [insert reviewers' names]

4. [insert editors]

5. Wikipedia users who edited article

P767

P767 Q P1114

Compulsory
Specific tasks of this person or group
  1. Lead author and creator of animated explanation of systematic reviews
  2. Author
  3. Peer-reviewer
  4. Editor
  5. Article editing and improvement
P767 Q P2868 Compulsory
Methods of involvement of participants P767 Q P2283
Outcomes and outputs What was the outcome or output of the involvement? 1 and 2 : Article for peer review

3 and 5: improved content and quality of article

4: Technical support with editorial process

P1542 Compulsory
Were any publication produced as part of this? https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_Preprint/Systematic_review P921 Compulsory
Involvement appraisal Methods of appraising and analysing involvement (assessing rigour, deciding outcome measures, data collection and analysis)
Facilitators of involvement (what helps the contributors in achieving the project's outcomes?)

'stated as' free text

P1552 Q101097118 P5102

P1552 Q101097118 P6001

Barriers of involvement (what inhibits the contributors from achieving the project's outcomes?)

'stated as' free text

P1552 Q16515105 P5102

P1552 Q16515105 P6001

What was the outcome or output of the involvement of these people? What changed as a result of involving people? Were there any impacts? P767 Q P1542
Stage Which stage of the initiative were these people involved? P767 Q P585 or

P767 Q P580 and

P767 Q P582

Cost and time What was the estimated financial cost for involving each person or group

How much time did it take to involve each person or group

Were there any other non-financial costs in involving each person or group

P767 Q P2130

P767 Q P2047

P767 Q P1542

Learning points Was anything learned from the process of involving these people?

What was the learning about

What topic was learned

P1542 Q133500

P1542 Q133500 P518

P1542 Q133500 P921

Input: Financial or other interests Financial or other interests Financial relationship or other interest this person has to this project Not applicable P767 Q P1932

P1542 Q99429881 P6001

Compulsory
Conflicting or competing interests

'stated as' free text

Jack Nunn is a member of the editorial board of the Wiki Journal of Science and Wiki Journal of Humanities P1552 Q99429881 P1932

P1552 Q99429881 P6001

Compulsory
What was the estimated financial cost for the overall initiative.

How much time did it take.

P2130

P2047

Output: Research data FAIR data produced Findable: How is information about this data disseminated Wikipedia, Wiki Journals, social media, databases, Scopus, Web of Science P1056 Q42848 P1552 Q100451967

P1056 Q42848 P7228

Compulsory
Accessible: How is it stored and hosted Open Access P1056 Q42848 P4945 Compulsory
Interoperable: What analyses were P4510
Interoperable: What format is it in P1056 Q42848 P2701
Reusable: Access restriction status Open Access P1056 Q42848 P7228 Q66739888 Compulsory
Reusable: License Creative Commons 4.0 by-sa P1056 Q42848 P275
Sensitive data produced Who owns it Not Applicable P1056 Q42848 P1552 Q2587068

P1056 Q42848 P127

Compulsory
Where is it stored Not Applicable P1056 Q42848 P276 Compulsory
Access restriction status Not Applicable P1056 Q42848 P7228 Compulsory
How to access (email)

How to access (url)

P1056 Q42848 P968

P1056 Q42848 P2699

Data steward/curator P1056 Q42848 P1640
Output: Impacts and outcomes Outcomes Has anything changed or happened as a result of this initiative that isn’t captured in previous answers? Nothing yet P1542 Compulsory
What was learned What new knowledge has been generated? (if appropriate, include effect size, relevant statistics and level or evidence) Nothing yet P1542 Compulsory
Knowledge translation Describe how the learning or knowledge generated from this initiative has or will be used P1542 Q133500 P1542
Measurement How has or how will this be measured? P1542 Q P459
Who is involved in measuring this? P1542 Q P767