0202410300001: Difference between revisions

From STARDIT
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 105: Line 105:
|inp_timespan=hours
|inp_timespan=hours
|inp_des=Volunteer hours spent giving feedback
|inp_des=Volunteer hours spent giving feedback
}}
|output_parameter={{output parameter
|out_typ=publication/report/document
|out_out=Document containing feedback on the ‘Draft Principles for Open Science Monitoring' from the members of the Citizen Science and Open Science Community of Practice
|out_dates=No
|out_url_oth=https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WF8T6
|out_imp=Shared with the Open science monitoring initiative (OSMI) (https://stardit.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/0202411270359)
}}
}}
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 21:57, 28 November 2024

Feedback on the ‘Draft Principles for Open Science Monitoring' from the members of the Citizen Science and Open Science Community of Practice Description: This report describes the co-creation of the feedback on the ‘Draft Principles for Open Science Monitoring' from the members of the Citizen Science and Open Science Community of Practice (https://stardit.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/0202410292351). The ‘Draft Principles for Open Science Monitoring' are an output of the Open science monitoring initiative (OSMI) (https://stardit.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/0202411270359)
STARDIT ID: 0202410300001
Dates

State ongoing
Start 2024-10-29
Form updated 2024-11-28

Report authors
Jack Nunn (link)
0000-0003-0316-3254
info@scienceforall.world
Created report
Aims
provide input, feedback and comment on the UNESCO ‘Draft Draft Principles for Open Science Monitoring' on behalf of members of the Citizen Science and Open Science Community of Practice'
Keywords
open science
UNESCO
citizen science
Category
research

Inputs

group of individuals

Members of the Citizen Science and Open Science Community of Practice


Task: Provided feedback, comment and input on the response to the ‘Draft Draft Principles for Open Science Monitoring'
Method: members of a community of practice
Recruitment: email
Communication: email, shared online collaborative document
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Jack Nunn (link)


ID: 0000-0003-0316-3254
Task: Organized and collated responses, summarized responses, provided feedback
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Antony K Cooper (link)


ID: 0000-0001-9411-2094
Task: Provided feedback
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Erin Roger (link)


ID: 0000-0002-9671-132X
Task: Provided feedback
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Jacqueline Goldin (link)


ID: 0000-0002-4830-3196
Task: Provided feedback
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Loreta Tauginienė (link)


ID: 0000-0002-3001-2200
Task: Provided feedback
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Gerid Hager (link)


ID: 0000-0003-2259-0278
Task: Provided feedback
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Pen-Yuan Hsing (link)


ID: 0000-0002-5394-879X
Task: Provided feedback
Compensation: volunteer
individual

Ilídio André Costa (link)


ID: 0000-0001-7340-7440
Task: Provided feedback
Compensation: volunteer
organisation

Science for All (link)


Task: Provided pro-bono time of Dr Jack Nunn for contributions to this project
Compensation: other
time

hours

Volunteer hours spent giving feedback

Outputs and impacts

publication/report/document

Document containing feedback on the ‘Draft Principles for Open Science Monitoring' from the members of the Citizen Science and Open Science Community of Practice (link)


Impact: Shared with the Open science monitoring initiative (OSMI) (https://stardit.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/0202411270359)
Retrieved from "https://stardit.wikimedia.org.au/w/index.php?title=0202410300001&oldid=1282"