0202407080037: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|location_link=No | |location_link=No | ||
|URL_parameter=osf.io/7bkhr | |URL_parameter=osf.io/7bkhr | ||
|ID_parameter={{ID parameter}} | |||
|author_parameter={{author parameter | |author_parameter={{author parameter | ||
|aut_nam=Danielle Pollock | |aut_nam=Danielle Pollock | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
|inp_inp=$39,460 | |inp_inp=$39,460 | ||
|inp_des=The University of Adelaide FHMS Building Leaders Grant | |inp_des=The University of Adelaide FHMS Building Leaders Grant | ||
}} | |||
|ethics_parameter={{ethics parameter | |||
|eth_nam=University of Adelaide Human Research Ethics Committee | |||
|eth_ids=H-2024-188 | |||
|ethics_link=No | |||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:32, 17 October 2024
The PROSPECT Delphi Study: Prioritising methodological research questions for scoping reviews, mapping reviews and evidence and gap maps for health research Description: To develop a research agenda for scoping reviews, mapping reviews, and evidence and gap maps in health by identifying and prioritising specific research questions related to methodological uncertainties.
STARDIT ID:
STARDIT ID:
0202407080037
Dates
State ongoing
Start 2024-03-18
End 2025-02-28
Form updated 2024-10-17
Report authors
Location
Australia
URL
osf.io/7bkhr
Other IDs
{{{id_typ}}}: {{{id_val}}}
Aims
To identify and compile the methodological uncertainties for each big picture review related to health research.
To create a priority list for each evidence synthesis of the top ten methodological research questions that need to be addressed regarding big picture reviews related to health research.
Keywords
Methodology
Scoping reviews
Mapping reviews
Evidence and Gap Maps
Evidence Synthesis
Delphi
Category
research
Inputs
funding
$39,460
The University of Adelaide FHMS Building Leaders Grant