0202312040033: Difference between revisions

From STARDIT
Jump to navigation Jump to search
wikispore>Isabella.sherburn
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
|location_parameter=Australia
|location_parameter=Australia
|location_link=No
|location_link=No
|URL_parameter=https://www.australiangenomics.org.au/projects/involve-australia-public-involvement-in-genomic-research/
|URL_parameter=www.australiangenomics.org.au/projects/involve-australia-public-involvement-in-genomic-research/
|author_parameter={{author parameter
|author_parameter={{author parameter
|aut_nam=Isabella Sherburn
|aut_nam=Isabella Sherburn
Line 44: Line 44:
|con_com=Online synchronous meetings (video/tele conference); Online shared documents; Online asynchronous discussion; Tracked changes and comments in static documents
|con_com=Online synchronous meetings (video/tele conference); Online shared documents; Online asynchronous discussion; Tracked changes and comments in static documents
|con_cop=honourarium
|con_cop=honourarium
|con_ena=Offering payment to working group members; Online meetings; F2F meetings for discussions on bigger pieces of work; Reimbursement of travel expenses for F2F meetings; More than one community member in the working group; Existing relationships with community members and community member networks to draw on when forming working group; Community members involved in the working group had prior experience in research settings; Distribution of meeting documents prior to the monthly meeting so community members have time to review and process these for discussion. Documents were also able to be commented on post-meeting
|con_ena=Offering payment to working group members; Online meetings; F2F meetings for discussions on bigger pieces of work; Reimbursement of travel expenses for F2F meetings; More than one community member in the working group; Existing relationships with community members and community member networks to draw on when forming working group; Community members involved in the working group had prior experience in research settings; Distribution of meeting documents prior to the monthly meeting so community members have time to review and process these for discussion. Documents were also able to be commented on post-meeting
|con_ena=Offering payment to working group members; Online meetings; F2F meetings for discussions on bigger pieces of work; Reimbursement of travel expenses for F2F meetings; More than one community member in the working group; Existing relationships with community members and community member networks to draw on when forming working group; Community members involved in the working group had prior experience in research settings; Distribution of meeting documents prior to the monthly meeting so community members have time to review and process these for discussion. Documents were also able to be commented on post-meeting
|con_imp=Original timeline stated that we would develop, evaluate and pilot the guidelines within the three-year grant. Involving community members lengthened this process, however it ensured there was a rigorous public consultation process to ensure the guidelines being developed were as useful to stakeholders as possible; Additional community member review of the community involvement guidelines allowed us to ensure that the community voice can still be heard throughout the document; Development of a remuneration policy, which we didn’t originally plan to do. After discussions with the working group and research into the scoping review, it was noted how important offering payment to community members is. A policy was developed and made available online for us by Australian Genomics and Australian Genomics-supported projects.
|con_imp=Original timeline stated that we would develop, evaluate and pilot the guidelines within the three-year grant. Involving community members lengthened this process, however it ensured there was a rigorous public consultation process to ensure the guidelines being developed were as useful to stakeholders as possible; Additional community member review of the community involvement guidelines allowed us to ensure that the community voice can still be heard throughout the document; Development of a remuneration policy, which we didn’t originally plan to do. After discussions with the working group and research into the scoping review, it was noted how important offering payment to community members is. A policy was developed and made available online for us by Australian Genomics and Australian Genomics-supported projects.
|con_dates=No
|con_dates=No

Revision as of 02:40, 4 April 2024

Description: Involve Australia has engaged with the public to develop community involvement guidelines for genomic researchers. The project partnered with patient support and advocacy groups, patients and carers, people who involve community in their research, interested members of the public, genomic researchers and healthcare professionals.

The project investigated the public and community involvement landscape in Australian healthcare research and used existing resources to aid the development of guidelines specifically for genomic research.

Unlike many guidelines, Involve Australia built its guidelines from the community member perspective. This allowed community members to highlight what they need if they are to continue to be involved in research. Ensuring their needs are built into genomic researchers’ involvement strategies before projects begin provides a standard for other fields of healthcare research. Ultimately, this will improve patients’ journeys towards better health.
Dates

State ongoing
Start 2021-07-01
End 2025-12-31
Form updated 2024-04-04

Report authors
Isabella Sherburn (link)
isabella.sherburn@mcri.edu.au
main report author
Keri Finlay (link)
checked report data
Jack Nunn (link)
0000-0003-0316-3254
Adding information, checking information
Location
Australia
URL
www.australiangenomics.org.au/projects/involve-australia-public-involvement-in-genomic-research/
Aims
To develop a set of community involvement guidelines for genomic researchers, prioritising the voice of community members.
To pilot and evaluate the community involvement guidelines to ensure they are implementable and fit for purpose.
Keywords
health consumer
community member
genomics
guidelines
citizen science
patient involvement
public involvement
consumer involvement
community involvement
research
health research
genomic research
learning
education
impact
researcher
professional development
Category
research

Inputs

organisation

Australian Genomics (link)



Task: coordinated project | provided funding staff
group of individuals

Involve Australia Working Group (8)



Task: Scoping review: • Provided feedback on what types of data should be extracted. • Provided resources for inclusion in review. • Undertook data extraction for cross-checking purposes. • Several working group members will review | Health perceptions survey: • Provided feedback on survey questions and data to be collected. • Testing survey. • Assisted with survey data analysis (quantitative and qualitative). • Assisted with recruitment by emailing survey invitations to their networks. | Key informant interviews: • Provided feedback on interview questions. • Assisted with recruitment by emailing interview invitations to their networks. | Working group discussions and meetings: • Members attended monthly formal working group meetings via videoconferencing • Informed of project updates • Provided feedback on key documents and outputs of the project. Other tasks: • Working group members co-presented to researcher network meetings
Method: Monthly formal working group meetings with project updates and time for discussion and feedback on key documents.
Communication: Online synchronous meetings (video/tele conference) | Online shared documents | Online asynchronous discussion | Tracked changes and comments in static documents
Compensation: honourarium
Impact: Original timeline stated that we would develop, evaluate and pilot the guidelines within the three-year grant. Involving community members lengthened this process, however it ensured there was a rigorous public consultation process to ensure the guidelines being developed were as useful to stakeholders as possible | Additional community member review of the community involvement guidelines allowed us to ensure that the community voice can still be heard throughout the document | Development of a remuneration policy, which we didn’t originally plan to do. After discussions with the working group and research into the scoping review, it was noted how important offering payment to community members is. A policy was developed and made available online for us by Australian Genomics and Australian Genomics-supported projects.
funding


Project funding


NHMRC GNT2000001, Australian Genomics Grant Program
time


3 years


Involve Australia Project Coordinator
time


3 years


Involve Australia Project Officer
funding


AUD $6000


Consumer payment (mid-2022 to 2023)
time


3 hours per quarter hours


Administrative tasks associated with consumer payments

Outputs and impacts

publication/report/document

Community Involvement Guidelines for Genomic Researchers



Impact: Guidelines will be piloted and evaluated 2024-2025.


This is a set of 17 recommendations divided into five overarching domains that describe key elements of good community involvement practice.
publication/report/document

Australian Genomics Consumer Honoraria and Reimbursement Policy



Impact: This policy is being used across several Australian Genomics priority projects and being used/adapted by partner projects.


This was developed to ensure Australian Genomics and its supported projects are provided with the appropriate guidance for community member payment.
publication/report/document
Stage: End of project - December 2023
Guidelines for Community Involvement in Genomic Research (link)

Impact: Guidelines endorsed by multiple organisations
publication/report/document
Stage: End of project - December 2023
Guiding Questions for Researchers (link)



A supporting document for the Guidelines for Community Involvement in Genomic Research
other
Stage: Mid-project
Response to feedback (link)


Impact: Feedback from the draft guidelines affected the final version of guidelines by making them more readable, useable and intuitive


Response to feedback for Involve Australia’s 'Guidelines for Community Involvement in Genomic Research'