0202312040033

From STARDIT
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Involve Australia Guidelines for Community Involvement in Genomic Research development and pilot Description: Involve Australia has engaged with the public to develop community involvement guidelines for genomic researchers. The project partnered with patient support and advocacy groups, patients and carers, people who involve community in their research, interested members of the public, genomic researchers and healthcare professionals.

The project investigated the public and community involvement landscape in Australian healthcare research and used existing resources to aid the development of guidelines specifically for genomic research.

Unlike many guidelines, Involve Australia built its guidelines from the community member perspective. This allowed community members to highlight what they need if they are to continue to be involved in research. Ensuring their needs are built into genomic researchers’ involvement strategies before projects begin provides a standard for other fields of healthcare research. Ultimately, this will improve patients’ journeys towards better health.
STARDIT ID: 0202312040033
Dates

State completed
Start 2021-07-01
End 2025-06-30
Form updated 2025-08-06

Location
Australia
URL
australiangenomics.org.au/projects/involve-australia-public-involvement-in-genomic-research/
Aims
To develop a set of community involvement guidelines for genomic researchers, prioritising the voice of community members.
To pilot and evaluate the community involvement guidelines to ensure they are implementable and fit for purpose.
Keywords
health consumer
community member
genomics
guidelines
citizen science
patient involvement
public involvement
consumer involvement
community involvement
research
health research
genomic research
learning
education
impact
researcher
professional development
Category
research

Inputs

organisation

Australian Genomics (link)



Task: coordinated project | provided funding staff
group of individuals

Involve Australia Working Group (8)



Task: Scoping review: • Provided feedback on what types of data should be extracted. • Provided resources for inclusion in review. • Undertook data extraction for cross-checking purposes. • Several working group members will review | Health perceptions survey: • Provided feedback on survey questions and data to be collected. • Testing survey. • Assisted with survey data analysis (quantitative and qualitative). • Assisted with recruitment by emailing survey invitations to their networks. | Key informant interviews: • Provided feedback on interview questions. • Assisted with recruitment by emailing interview invitations to their networks. | Working group discussions and meetings: • Members attended monthly formal working group meetings via videoconferencing • Informed of project updates • Provided feedback on key documents and outputs of the project.

Other tasks: • Working group members co-presented to researcher network meetings
Method: Monthly formal working group meetings with project updates and time for discussion and feedback on key documents.
Communication: Online synchronous meetings (video/tele conference) | Online shared documents | Online asynchronous discussion | Tracked changes and comments in static documents
Compensation: honourarium
Impact: Original timeline stated that we would develop, evaluate and pilot the guidelines within the three-year grant. Involving community members lengthened this process, however it ensured there was a rigorous public consultation process to ensure the guidelines being developed were as useful to stakeholders as possible | Additional community member review of the community involvement guidelines allowed us to ensure that the community voice can still be heard throughout the document | Development of a remuneration policy, which we didn’t originally plan to do. After discussions with the working group and research into the scoping review, it was noted how important offering payment to community members is. A policy was developed and made available online for us by Australian Genomics and Australian Genomics-supported projects.
individual

Monica Ferrie



Task: Project lead, member of working group
Compensation: paid
individual

Sean Murray



Task: Project lead
Compensation: paid
individual

Anne McKenzie



Task: Project lead
Compensation: paid
individual

Tiffany Boughtwood



Task: Working group member
Compensation: paid
individual

John Cannings



Task: Working group member
Compensation: paid
individual

Gregory Pratt



Task: Working group member
Compensation: paid
individual

Fiona Russo



Task: Working group member
Compensation: paid
individual

Jack Nunn



Task: Working group member
Compensation: paid
funding


Project funding


NHMRC GNT2000001, Australian Genomics Grant Program
time


3 years


Involve Australia Project Coordinator
time


3 years


Involve Australia Project Officer
funding


AUD $6000


Consumer payment (mid-2022 to 2023)
time


3 hours per quarter hours


Administrative tasks associated with consumer payments
Ethics approver
The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee
ID: HREC/81078/RCHM-2022

Outputs and impacts

STARDIT report information

STARDIT report authors
Isabella Sherburn (link)
isabella.sherburn@mcri.edu.au
main report author
Keri Finlay (link)
checked report data
Jack Nunn (link)
0000-0003-0316-3254
Adding information, checking information

Free text